Health Blog

Tips | Recommendations | Reviews

How To Implement Value Based Healthcare?

How To Implement Value Based Healthcare
Measure health outcomes and costs – It is a truism of business that management requires measurement. Recognizing that the essential purpose of health care is improving the health of patients, it is axiomatic that health care teams must measure the health results as well as the costs of delivering care for each patient.

Leaders cannot align health care organizations with their purpose without measurement of health outcomes. In addition, the current dearth of accurate health outcomes and cost data impedes innovation. Measurement of results allows teams to know they are succeeding. Measuring health outcomes also provides the data needed to improve care and efficiency.

Although caregivers are burdened with reporting reams of information, they rarely consistently track the health outcomes that matter most to patients and thus to themselves as clinicians. Cost and health outcomes data also enable condition-based bundled payment models, empowering teams of caregivers to reclaim professional autonomy and practice clinical judgment—two integral elements of professional satisfaction and powerful antidotes to the affliction of burnout.1, 12–14 Measuring health outcomes is not as complex as it is often perceived to be.

  • Routine clinical practice does not dictate, nor can it support, the voluminous health outcome measure sets used in clinical research.
  • Instead, clinicians need to focus on measuring the outcomes that define health for their patients.
  • Those outcomes cluster by patient segment—the outcomes that matter most to patients with congestive heart failure are strikingly consistent while also markedly different from the outcomes that matter most to women who are pregnant.

Within any given patient segment, though, patients define health in terms of capability, comfort, and calm, as described above, and these dimensions can be usually captured in 3 to 5 measures. For example, men undergoing prostate cancer surgery are most concerned about the common impairments from that procedure—incontinence, impotence, and depression—as well as time away from work for recovery.

What is value based practice in HealthCare?

Key Areas of Collaboration – Values-based Practice (VBP) is a clinical skills-based approach to working with complex and conflicting values in healthcare. It is a twin framework to evidence-based practice (EBP). Phenomenology of Hallucinations The registration for the second lecture of the Institute of Applied Psychology Interdisciplinary Series third season is open. We will be honoured to host Massimiliano Aragona with a talk titled: “Phenomenology of Hallucinations” INPP Conference postponed to May 2024 Due to late rescheduling of another international conference in Vienna, we regret to inform you that the upcoming INPP Conference has been postponed to May (02.05.2024-04.05.2024) next year. We understand the inconvenience this may cause and apologize for any disruption to your plans. The Institute of Applied Psychology Interdisciplinary Series The Institute of Applied Psychology (Jagiellonian University, Kraków) together with its partners are pleased to announce the third edition of “The Institute of Applied Psychology Interdisciplinary Series.” Ruth Devaraj has joined the Collaborating Centre’s management team as Centre administrator from 1st March 2023. New publication added to the Wiki VBP Reference Library. Quality Versus Quantity of Life: Beyond the Dichotomy A restrictive and dichotomous question has become the primary approach in many goals of care discussions. Is the primary goal of care quantity of life through aggressive therapy or quality of life through comfort care and hospice? Meaningful Voices: Fostering Epistemic Justice in Public Mental Health The focus of this pilot research co-creation is identifying and overcoming epistemic injustice, a complex set of harms and wrongs that may affect vulnerable groups and individuals.

What is value based practice in health and social care?

Values-based practice (VBP) is the theory and skills base for effective health care decision. making where different (and hence potentially conflicting) values are in play. (Fulford, 2004)

How would you put value into practice?

To move values into practice, we expect our community to: – Listen to others’ points of view and respectfully seek to understand them, acknowledging that those in power or positions of privilege have a real opportunity to encourage inclusion and, intentionally or not, may do harm by discourag ing expression.

  1. Ensure equitable access to learning and research opportunities, deploying inclusive teaching strategies, supporting productive collaboration and honest communication, challenging assumptions that limit opportunity, and mitigating barriers to success.
  2. Provide opportunity for growth and career advancement, creating an environment that recognizes the unique qualities, talents, and perspectives of each individual and in which each person can flourish and thrive.

Understand and mentor across difference, recognizing the barriers in the institutional environment and career advancement that will vary because each of us brings a difference in background, identity, privilege, and cultural sensitivity to our academic home.

Recognize that solutions reside in the institution as well as the individual, owning responsibility to question and improve our institutional climate even as we help strengthen individual resilience. Act when we have concerns on behalf of ourselves or others, understanding that action may take different forms—direct, delegated, deferred—depending upon the circumstances and individuals involved.

Our community is broad and we apply these practices in varied contexts. Each of the above points calls out for further expansion and contextual elaboration to create local meanings that guide professional behavior. We invite all members of our community to engage in the necessary conversations that bring these ideas to practical and relevant application.

  • Accountability.
  • Each member of the Stanford Earth community contributes to the realization of our values through their own behavior and as an upstander who acts on behalf of others.
  • An upstander is a person who speaks or acts in support of an individual or cause, particularly someone who intervenes on behalf of a person being attacked, harassed, or bullied.

This is often contrasted to a “bystander,” who sees, but fails to act in support. Anyone who believes they have been subjected to any form of harassment, discrimination, or abusive conduct should connect to resources and reporting structures appropriate to the situation.

Each University or School policy has its own review process and possible outcomes. Individuals found to have violated a University or School policy or who fail to live up to our values may incur a range of consequences. For students, these include (but are not limited to): constructive conversation, formal warning, grade impact, community service, suspension, and expulsion.

For faculty and staff, these may include (but are not limited to): constructive conversation, formal warning, salary and/or promotion impact, restriction on accepting/advising students or supervising others, removal from leadership positions, and termination.

What is value based approach?

Key Takeaways –

Value-based pricing is based on a consumer’s perceived value of the product or service in question.Value-based pricing means that companies base their pricing on how much the customer believes a product is worth.Unique and highly valuable products are best-positioned to take advantage of the value-based pricing model.Commoditized items are poorly positioned to use value-based pricing.Value-based pricing is different from cost-plus pricing, which factors the costs of production into pricing.

Why is values-based practice important?

Abstract – Background The provision of health care is inseparable from universal values such as caring, helping and compassion. Consideration for individual values, particularly those of the patient, has also been increasing. However, such consideration is difficult within the context of modern health care, where complex and conflicting values are often in play.

  • This is particularly so when a patient’s values seem to be at odds with evidence-based practice or widely shared ethical principles, or when a health professional’s personal values may compromise the care provided.
  • Suggested new framework Values-based practice, a framework developed originally in the domain of mental health, maintains that values are pervasive and powerful parameters influencing decisions about health, clinical practice and research, and that their impact is often underestimated.

Although it shares starting points with other approaches to values, it suggests that our current approaches lead us to ignore some important manifestations of values at both the general level, as relevant in legal, policy and research contexts, as well as at the individual level, as relevant in clinical practice.

delivery of health care ethics evidence-based medicine, trends models, theoretical professional-patient relations social values

Received July 4, 2004. Revision received September 23, 2004. Accepted December 23, 2005.

© British Journal of General Practice, 2006.

View Full Text

What is values-based approach and compliance?

Compliance vs Values Orientation: Is There a Difference? Marisa A. Colston, PhD, ATC and Gretchen Schlabach, PhD, ATC The NATA Professional Responsibility in Athletic Training (PRAT) Committee received support from the NATA Board of Directors to identify shared professional values (PV) among NATA members.

To date, unlike many other healthcare professional organizations, members of the NATA do not have shared PV. Our members must abide by and be mindful of the numerous legal, ethical and regulatory (LER) statutes, principles, and rules of professional practice in athletic training (aka, compliance orientation).

While this form of orientation serves a critical purpose for NATA members, the PRAT proposes the addition of a values orientation approach, which supports and simplifies the necessary, but countless professional documents. The primary difference between the two types of orientation is that compliance orientation is rules based, whereas values orientation is ethically/morally based.

The ability to recall in the compliance approach is difficult (i.e., countless documents to remember), however recall is easy for values orientation (i.e., only 5-10 PV). The motivation for each also differs with compliance orientation being driven by external motivation and values orientation being internally motivated.

The most impactful difference, however, is found in the overall objective for each approach. Compliance orientation is designed to prevent misconduct, however, the objective for the “values” approach is to enable professional conduct, Perspective does make a difference.

The “Compliance” approach requires a deliberate analysis of LER statutes, principles, and rules of professional practice, In contrast, the “Values” orientation approach requires an acquisition and internalization of values, which in turn, guides good/right conduct. As such compliance orientation is more measured in comparison to the values orientation.

Given PV are moral in nature, they serve to inspire intuitive and impulsive good/right conduct, which becomes particularly helpful for the many spontaneous challenges encountered by athletic trainers in all settings. Both orientations encourage good/right professional conduct.

The compliance orientation works well when time is not an issue and one can be measured in his or her analysis. On the other hand in emergent situations, the values orientation works well to ensure that impulsive, initial actions are in a good/right direction. When combined, both orientations are compelling.

Information on the specific PV selected by and for the NATA membership will be presented at the 2021 TATS Annual Meeting and Clinical Symposium and will also be forthcoming by the NATA MarCom. : Compliance vs Values Orientation: Is There a Difference?

What is the value practice?

Practice, Value, and Principle: These Three Will Change How You See the World Think of who you want to be | Photo by on Practice is action, the specific acts you commit and decisions you make in different situations. Value is the reason why, your logic and reasoning to do something. Think of it as the paths you take in life. Principle is the foundation, the core, what determines right and wrong. Photo by on

What are the 7 care values?

These are the guiding principles that help to put the interests of the individual receiving care or support at the centre of everything we do. Examples include: individuality, independence, privacy, partnership, choice, dignity, respect and rights.

What are the 3 main core values?

What is An Example of A Core Value? – Integrity, kindness, honesty, and financial security are typical examples of personal core values. Others often see these values as your character traits. For example, someone is known for always doing the right thing likely values integrity,

  1. Suppose you have a core value of freedom.
  2. In that case, you might avoid traditional work and instead work as an entrepreneur–even if this means working longer hours and having more financial uncertainty.
  3. Another common example relates to money.
  4. Pretend like your close friend has a fancy car.
  5. When you ride in the car with them, you think, “Wow, someday I am going to buy myself one of these.” But when you get home, remember that you genuinely value financial security for your family more than flashy material items.
See also:  Can Healthcare Workers Work With Covid?

Even if you had the money to buy that car, you wouldn’t do it because it doesn’t align with your deeper principles about life. ↑ Table of Contents ↑

What are the 7 types of values?

The seven core values include honesty, boldness, freedom, trust, team spirit, modesty, and responsibility.

What is an example of a value based strategy?

When is Value-Based Pricing Used – Value-based pricing is used when the perceived value of the product is high. The strategy tends to involve products that possess a certain level of prestige in ownership or are completely unique. Designer apparel companies are well-known for using value-based pricing.

  • While a designer shirt may cost nominally more than a non-designer shirt to produce, the status carried by the designer brand increases the perceived value of the shirt.
  • Many companies capitalize on such perception, increasing their margins greatly, while minimally reducing sales volume.
  • A similar strategy may also be used when the purchasing decision is emotionally driven.

For example, while a famous painting may sell for millions of dollars at an auction, the cost of creating that painting is meaningless relative to the sale price. The value and price are being derived from the prestige of the artist, as well as other emotional aspects that the buyer may connect with.

What is a good value strategy?

Value added pricing strategies – Value-added pricing and marketing strategies, on the other hand, focus on building the perceived value of a product. This is often done to justify a higher price. Unlike a good value pricing strategy, a value added strategy focuses on what makes a product different and unique.

You definitely want to look at features, but the focus of your campaign should be more on the benefits. So, if you’re a marketer creating a campaign for a luxury or high-priced product, it’s time to dust off your textbooks and revisit Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, Add value at the top of the pyramid: focus on how your product makes someone feel,

Will the product boost their social status? Will it help the consumer reach their full potential? Build value around these ideas. How To Implement Value Based Healthcare

What is the difference between values-based and ethical practice?

Values are ideals of someone (or a group) about what is good or bad (or desirable or undesirable). Ethics is all about reasoning how to do the right action. Values motivate, while morals and ethics constrain.

What are the benefits of a values-based culture?

Benefits of a Values-based Organization Benefits of a Values-based Organization: Common purpose and common values are critical to ensuring progressive and innovative business models. All organizations experience change and require flexibility from their employees, but this is made more manageable when the individual’s and organization’s values are aligned: this is the definition of a values-based organization.

Often, people fear professional change and can be overwhelmed because they aren’t sure of how to adapt to new procedures. The beauty of modelling values-based leadership is that it empowers all staff members to cope better with uncertainty because by following the organization’s guiding principles much of this fear can be alleviated.

For example, if certain organizational values are present and refined within employees, it provides a roadmap to achieving the common long-term vision of the organization. Market research shows that companies with a culture based on shared values consistently outperform other companies by significant margins.

  1. So, here are some other major benefits of a values-based organization: It’s good for productivity The values-based organizational culture raises team morale and fulfilment.
  2. Because employees feel more in tune with the organization, they become more enthusiastic about their work and prouder of their input into the business’ success.

Therefore, they are more productive and creative in their thinking. The ultimate result is the most important goal of any organization: increased customer satisfaction. It makes for great working relationships Common purpose and shared values encourage open dialogue.

  1. And this, in turn, leads to better internal communication and understanding.
  2. Ultimately, this means more harmony and information-sharing between groups and departments, making for more effective working relations.
  3. It empowers employees Values-based leadership sets an example within organizations.
  4. As employees become more motivated in their work their confidence grows and they inevitably become more flexible in their attitudes and more responsive to handle strategic change and market challenges.

This determination also leads them to be more creative and innovative when finding solutions for challenges. It grows customer satisfaction Higher employee satisfaction invariably leads to greater customer satisfaction. It is the vital difference between dealing with a person who is simply going through the motions of their role, and dealing with someone who is on a personal mission to design solutions that tick every box and alleviate every concern.

This can only have a positive effect on customer satisfaction. It impresses partners A values-based culture also lends itself to better performance management and increased effectiveness in the management system- something that will be noticeable to external partners. The result is an increased level of trust for the organization and its capabilities, and greater industry standing and respect.

Value-based organizations thrive because they foster a common purpose among all employees. Sharing values provides guiding principles that everyone can use when performing their functions; vital for personal accountability, better decision-making, and a great team spirit.

What is the squeaky wheel principle in values-based practice?

The ‘squeaky wheel’ principle in values-based practice (VBP) is based on the idea that problems involving values often have a way of drawing attention to themselves and this requires a considered response, but it’s also important not to lose sight of evidence and facts when these situations arise.

What are the five approaches to values?

Values are defined in literature as everything from eternal ideas to behavioral actions. As used here values refer to criteria for determining levels of goodness, worth or beauty. Values are affectively-laden thoughts about objects, ideas, behavior, etc.

  1. That guide behavior, but do not necessarily require it (Rokeach, 1973).
  2. The act of valuing is considered an act of making value judgments, an expression of feeling, or the acquisition of and adherence to a set of principles.
  3. We are covering values as part of the affective system.
  4. However, once they are developed they provide an important filter for selecting input and connecting thoughts and feelings to action and thus could also be included in a discussion of the regulatory system.

Some of the values designated by the SCANS report (Whetzel, 1992) as important for workers in the information age are responsibility, self-esteem, sociability, integrity, and honesty. Huitt (1997) suggests an additional set of important values that are either implied in the SCANS report or are suggested by the writings of futurists or behavioral scientists as important for life success: autonomy, benevolence, compassion, courage, courtesy, honesty, integrity, responsibility, trustworthiness, and truthfulness.

Other lists of core values have been developed. For example, a group of educators, character education experts, and leaders of youth organizations meeting under the sponsorship of The Josephson Institute of Ethics developed the following list: respect, responsibility, trustworthiness, caring, justice and fairness, and civic virtue and citizenship ( The Character Education Partnership, Inc,, 1996).

The Council for Global Education (1997) asserts the following set of values are either stated or implied in the Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights: compassion, courtesy, critical inquiry, due process, equality of opportunity, freedom of thought and action, human worth and dignity, integrity, justice, knowledge, loyalty, objectivity, order, patriotism, rational consent, reasoned argument, respect for other’s rights, responsibility, responsible citizenship, rule of law, tolerance, and truth.

Despite the debate over exactly what are the core values that ought to be taught in schools, the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (1996) suggests it is possible for communities to reach consensus on a set of values that would be appropriate for inclusion in the school curriculum.

Once a community has done so, the next issue is how should one go about the process of teaching values. As a beginning effort in this direction, I have developed a ” Survey of Desired Values, Virtues, and Attributes “. A preliminary study shows considerable overlap in beliefs among preservice and practicing educators ( Huitt, 2003 ).

  1. Values Education Values education is an explicit attempt to teach about values and/or valuing.
  2. Superka, Ahrens, & Hedstrom (1976) state there are five basic approaches to values education: inculcation, moral development, analysis, values clarification, and action learning,
  3. This text was used as the major source for the organization of the following presentation.

Inculcation Most educators viewing values education from the perspective of inculcation see values as socially or culturally accepted standards or rules of behavior. Valuing is therefore considered a process of the student identifying with and accepting the standards or norms of the important individuals and institutions within his society.

The student “incorporates” these values into his or her own value system. These educators take a view of human nature in which the individual is treated, during the inculcation process, as a reactor rather than as an initiator. Extreme advocates such as Talcott Parsons (1951) believe that the needs and goals of society should transcend and even define the needs and goals of the individuals.

However, advocates who consider an individual to be a free, self-fulfilling participant in society tend to inculcate values as well, especially values such as freedom to learn, human dignity, justice, and self-exploration. Both the social- and individualistic-oriented advocates would argue the notion that certain values are universal and absolute.

The source of these values is open to debate. On the one hand some advocates argue they derive from the natural order of the universe; others believe that values originate in an omnipotent Creator. In addition to Parsons (1951), the theoretical work of Sears and his colleagues (1957, 1976) and Whiting (1961) provide support for this position.

More contemporary researchers include Wynne and Ryan (1989, 1992). The materials developed by the Georgia Department of Education (1997), the work of William Bennett (e.g., 1993) and The Character Education Institute (CEI) also promote the inculcation viewpoint.

Moral Development Educators adopting a moral development perspective believe that moral thinking develops in stages through a specific sequence. This approach is based primarily on the work of Lawrence Kohlberg (1969, 1984) as presented in his 6 stages and 25 “basic moral concepts.” This approach focuses primarily on moral values, such as fairness, justice, equity, and human dignity; other types of values (social, personal, and aesthetic) are usually not considered.

It is assumed that students invariantly progress developmentally in their thinking about moral issues. They can comprehend one stage above their current primary stage and exposure to the next higher level is essential for enhancing moral development. Educators attempt to stimulate students to develop more complex moral reasoning patterns through the sequential stages. Kohlberg’s view of human nature is similar to that presented in the ideas of other developmental psychologists such as Piaget (1932, 1962), Erikson (1950), and Loevinger et al. (1970). This perspective views the person as an active initiator and a reactor within the context of his or her environment; the individual cannot fully change the environment, but neither can the environment fully mold the individual.

  • A person’s actions are the result of his or her feelings, thoughts, behaviors, and experiences.
  • Although the environment can determine the content of one’s experiences, it cannot determine its form.
  • Genetic structures already inside the person are primarily responsible for the way in which a person internalizes the content, and organizes and transforms it into personally meaningful data.
See also:  What Is Ccda In Healthcare?

The moral development technique most often used is to present a hypothetical or factual value dilemma story which is then discussed in small groups. Students are presented with alternative viewpoints within these discussions which is in hypothesized to lead to higher, more developed moral thinking.

  1. The story must present “a real conflict for the central character”, include “a number of moral issues for consideration”, and “generate differences of opinion among students about the appropriate response to the situation.”
  2. A leader who can help to focus the discussion on moral reasoning.
  3. A classroom climate that encourages students to express their moral reasoning freely (Gailbraith & Jones, 1975, p.18).

There is an assumption that values are based on cognitive moral beliefs or concepts. This view would agree with the inculcation assumption that there are universal moral principles, but would contend that values are considered relative to a particular environment or situation and are applied according to the cognitive development of the individual.

  • Gilligan (1977, 1982) critiqued Kohlberg’s work based on his exclusive use of males in his original theoretical work.
  • Based on her study of girls and women, she proposed that females make moral decisions based on the development of the principle of care rather than on justice as Kohlberg had proposed.

Whereas Kohlberg identified autonomous decision making related to abstract principles as the highest form of moral thinking, Gilligan proposed that girls and women are more likely to view relationships as central with a win-win approach to resolving moral conflicts as the highest stage. In addition to the researchers cited above, Sullivan and his colleagues (1953, 1957) also provide support for this view include. Larry Nucci (1989), Director of the Office for Studies in Moral Development and Character Formation at the University of Illinois at Chicago has developed The Moral Development and Education Homepage to promote this approach.

Analysis The analysis approach to values education was developed mainly by social science educators. The approach emphasizes rational thinking and reasoning. The purpose of the analysis approach is to help students use logical thinking and the procedures of scientific investigation in dealing with values issues.

Students are urged to provide verifiable facts about the correctness or value of the topics or issues under investigation. A major assumption is that valuing is the cognitive process of determining and justifying facts and beliefs derived from those facts.

  • This approach concentrates primarily on social values rather than on the personal moral dilemmas presented in the moral development approach.
  • The rationalist (based on reasoning) and empiricist (based on experience) views of human nature seem to provide the philosophical basis for this approach.
  • Its advocates state that the process of valuing can and should be conducted under the ‘total authority of facts and reason’ (Scriven, 1966, p.232) and ‘guided not by the dictates of the heart and conscience, but by the rules and procedures of logic’ (Bond, 1970, p.81).

The teaching methods used by this approach generally center around individual and group study of social value problems and issues, library and field research, and rational class discussions. These are techniques widely used in social studies instruction.

  1. stating the issues;
  2. questioning and substantiating in the relevance of statements;
  3. applying analogous cases to qualify and refine value positions;
  4. pointing out logical and empirical inconsistencies in arguments;
  5. weighing counter arguments; and
  6. seeking and testing evidence.

A representative instructional model is presented by Metcalf (1971, pp.29-55):

  1. identify and clarify the value question;
  2. assemble purported facts;
  3. assess the truth of purported facts;
  4. clarify the relevance of facts;
  5. arrive at a tentative value decision; and
  6. test the value principle implied in the decision.

Additional support for this approach is provided by Ellis (1962), Kelly (1955), and Pepper (1947). The thinking techniques demonstrated by MindTools is an excellent example of strategies used in this approach. Values Clarification The values clarification approach arose primarily from humanistic psychology and the humanistic education movement as it attempted to implement the ideas and theories of Gordon Allport (1955), Abraham Maslow (1970), Carl Rogers (1969), and others.

  • The central focus is on helping students use both rational thinking and emotional awareness to examine personal behavior patterns and to clarify and actualize their values.
  • It is believed that valuing is a process of self-actualization, involving the subprocesses of choosing freely from among alternatives, reflecting carefully on the consequences of those alternatives, and prizing, affirming, and acting upon one’s choices.

Values clarification is based predominately on the work of Raths, Harmin & Simon (1978), Simon & Kirschenbaum (1973), and Simon, Howe & Kirschenbaum (1972). Whereas the inculcation approach relies generally on outside standards and the moral development and analysis approaches rely on logical and empirical processes, the values clarification approach relies on an internal cognitive and affective decision making process to decide which values are positive and which are negative.

  1. It is therefore an individualistic rather than a social process of values education.
  2. From this perspective, the individual, if he or she is allowed the opportunity of being free to be his or her true self, makes choices and decisions affected by the internal processes of willing, feeling, thinking, and intending.

It is assumed that through self-awareness, the person enters situations already pointed or set in certain directions. As the individual develops, the making of choices will more often be based on conscious, self-determined thought and feeling. It is advocated that the making of choices, as a free being, which can be confirmed or denied in experience, is a preliminary step in the creation of values (Moustakas, 1966).

Within the clarification framework a person is seen as an initiator of interaction with society and environment. The educator should assist the individual to develop his or her internal processes, thereby allowing them, rather than external factors, to be the prime determinants of human behavior; the individual should be free to change the environment to meet his or her needs.

Methods used in the values clarification approach include large- and small-group discussion; individual and group work; hypothetical, contrived, and real dilemmas; rank orders and forced choices; sensitivity and listening techniques; songs and artwork; games and simulations; and personal journals and interviews; self-analysis worksheet.

  1. A vital component is a leader who does not attempt to influence the selection of values.
  2. Like the moral development approach, values clarification assumes that the valuing process is internal and relative, but unlike the inculcation and developmental approaches it does not posit any universal set of appropriate values.

A sevenfold process describing the guidelines of the values clarification approach was formulated by Simon et al. (1972);

  1. choosing from alternatives;
  2. choosing freely;
  3. prizing one’s choice;
  4. affirming one’s choice;
  5. acting upon one’s choice; and
  6. acting repeatedly, over time.

Additional theorists providing support for the values clarification approach include Asch (1952) and G. Murphy (1958). Action Learning The action learning approach is derived from a perspective that valuing includes a process of implementation as well as development.

  • That is, it is important to move beyond thinking and feeling to acting.
  • The approach is related to the efforts of some social studies educators to emphasize community-based rather than classroom-based learning experiences.
  • In some ways it is the least developed of the five approaches.
  • However, a variety of recent programs have demonstrated the effectiveness of the techniques advocated by this approach (e.g., Cottom, 1996; Gauld, 1993; Solomon et al., 1992).

Advocates of the action learning approach stress the need to provide specific opportunities for learners to act on their values. They see valuing primarily as a process of self-actualization in which individuals consider alternatives; choose freely from among those alternatives; and prize, affirm, and act on their choices.

They place more emphasis on action-taking inside and outside the classroom than is reflected in the moral development, analysis, and values clarification processes. Values are seen to have their source neither in society nor in the individual but in the interaction between the person and the society; the individual cannot be described outside of his or her context.

The process of self-actualization, so important to the founders of the values clarification approach, is viewed as being tempered by social factors and group pressures. In this way it is more related to Maslow’s (1971) level of transcendence which he discussed towards the end of his career.

  • Input Phase -a problem is perceived and an attempt is made to understand the situation or problem 1. Identify the problem(s) and state it (them) clearly and concisely 2. State the criteria that will be used to evaluate possible alternatives to the problem as well as the effectiveness of selected solutions; state any identified boundaries of acceptable alternatives, important values or feelings to be considered, or results that should be avoided 3. Gather information or facts relevant to solving the problem or making a decision
  • Processing Phase -alternatives are generated and evaluated and a solution is selected 4. Develop alternatives or possible solutions 5. Evaluate the generated alternatives vis-a-vis the stated criteria 6. Develop a solution that will successfully solve the problem (diagnose possible problems with the solution and implications of these problems; consider the worst that can happen if the solution is implemented; evaluate in terms of overall “feelings” and “values”
  • Output Phase -includes planning for and implementing the solution 7. Develop plan for implementation (sufficiently detailed to allow for successful implementation) 8. Establish methods and criteria for evaluation of implementation and success 9. Implement the solution
  • Review Phase -the solution is evaluated and modifications are made, if necessary 10. Evaluating implementation of the solution (an ongoing process) 11. Evaluating the effectiveness of the solution 12. Modifying the solution in ways suggested by the evaluation process

Many of the teaching methods of similar to those used in analysis and values clarification, In fact, the first two phases of Huitt’s model are almost identical to the steps used in analysis. In some ways the skill practice in group organization and interpersonal relations and action projects is similar to that of Kohlberg’s “Just School” program that provides opportunities to engage in individual and group action in school and community (Power, Higgins & Kohlberg, 1989).

A major difference is that the action learning approach does not start from a preconceived notion of moral development. Schools of thought providing support for the action learning approach include: Adler, 1924; Bigge, 1971; Blumer, 1969; Dewey, 1939; Horney, 1950; Lewin, 1935; and Sullivan, 1953. The Values in Action and the Giraffe projects exemplify this approach.

Summary In summary, each of the approaches to values education has a view of human nature, as well as purposes, processes and methods used in the approach. For example, the inculcation approach has a basic view of human nature as a reactive organism. The analysis and values clarification approaches, on the other hand, view the human being as primarily active.

Overview of Typology of Values Education Approaches
Approach Purpose Methods
  • To instill or internalize certain values in students;
  • To change the values of students so they more nearly reflect certain desired values
  • Modeling;
  • Positive and negative reinforcement;
  • Manipulating alternatives;
  • Games and simulations;
  • Role playing
Moral Development
  • To help students develop more complex moral reasoning patterns based on a higher set of values;
  • To urge students to discuss the reasons for their value choices and positions, not merely to share with others, but to foster change in the stages of reasoning of students
  • Moral dilemma episodes with small-group discussion;
  • Relatively structured and argumentative without necessarily coming to a “right” answer
  • To help students use logical thinking and scientific investigation to decide value issues and questions
  • To help students use rational, analytical processes in interrelating and conceptualizing their values
  • Structured rational discussion that demands application of reasons as well as evidence;
  • Testing principles;
  • Analyzing analogous cases;
  • Research and debate
Values Clarification
  • To help students become aware of and identify their own values and those of others;
  • To help students communicate openly and honestly with others about their values;
  • To help students use both rational thinking and emotional awareness to examine their personal feelings, values, and behavior patterns
  • Role-playing games;
  • Simulations;
  • Contrived or real value-laden situations;
  • In-depth self-analysis exercises;
  • Sensitivity activities;
  • Out-of-class activities;
  • Small group discussions
Action Learning
  • Those purposes listed for analysis and values clarification;
  • To provide students with opportunities for personal and social action based on their values;
  • To encourage students to view themselves as personal-social interactive beings, not fully autonomous, but members of a community or social system
  • Methods listed for analysis and values clarification;
  • Projects within school and community practice;
  • Skill practice in group organizing and interpersonal relations
See also:  What Does Lep Stand For In Healthcare?


  • Adler, A. (1924). The practice and theory of individual psychology, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Allport, G. (1955). Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Asch, S. (1952). Social psychology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (1996). Schools as partners in character development (Press release). Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved December 1997, from,
  • Bennet, W. (Ed.). (1993). The book of virtues: A treasury of great moral stories, New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Bigge, M. (1971). Positive relativism: An emergent educational philosophy, New York: Harper & Row.
  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symboic interactionism: Perspective and method, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bond, D. (1970). An analysis of valuation strategies in social science education materials (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Berkeley, CA: School of Education, University of California.
  • Brown, L., & Gilligan, C. (1992). Meeting at the crossroads: Women’s psychology and girls’ development, New York: Ballantine Books.
  • Dewey, J. (1939). Theory of valuation (International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol II). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
  • Cottom, C. (1996). A bold experiment in teaching values. Educational Leadership, 53 (8), 54-58.
  • Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy, New York: Lyle Stuart.
  • Erikson, E. (1950). Childhood and society, New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Gailbraith, R., & Jones, T. (1975, January). Teaching strategies for moral dilemmas: An application of Kohlberg’s theory of moral development to the social studies classroom. Social Education, 39, 16-22.
  • Gauld, J. (1993). Character first: The Hyde school difference, San Francisco: ICS Press.
  • Georgia Department of Education. (1997). Values education implementation guide, Atlanta, GA: Office of Instructional Services, Georgia Department of Education. Retrieved December 1997, from,
  • Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: Women’s conceptualizations of self and morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 481-517.
  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Horney, K. (1950). Neurosis and human growth. New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Huitt, W. (1992). Problem solving and decision making: Consideration of individual differences using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Psychological Type, 24, 33-44. Retrieved December 1997, from,
  • Huitt, W. (1997). The SCANS report revisited, Paper delivered at the Fifth Annual Gulf South Business and Vocational Education Conference, Valdosta State University, Valdosta, GA, April 18. Retrieved December 1997, from,
  • Huitt, W. (2003). Important values for school-aged children and youth: A preliminary report, Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved December 2003, from,
  • Kelly, G. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs, New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In D. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research, Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development, San Francisco: Harper & Row.
  • Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Loevinger, J. et al. (1970). Measuring ego development, Volumes I and II. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Maslow, A. (1970). Toward a psychology of being, Princetion, NJ: Viking.
  • Maslow, A.(1971). The farther reaches of human nature, New York: Viking Press.
  • Metcalf, L. (Ed.). (1971). Values education: Rationale strategies and procedures,41st Yearbook of the National Council for the Social Studies. Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies.
  • Moustakas, C. (1966). The authentic teacher: Sensitivity and awareness in the classroom, Cambridge, MA: Howard A. Doyle.
  • Murphy, G. (1958). Human potentialities, New York: Basic Books.
  • Nucci, L. (Ed.). (1989). Moral development and character education: A dialogue, Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
  • Parsons, T. (1951). The social system, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  • Pepper, S. (1958). The sources of value, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Piaget, J. (1932, 1962). The moral judgment of the child, New York: Collier.
  • Power, C., Higgens, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1989). The habit of the common life: Building character through democratic community schools. In L. Nucci (Ed.), (1989). Moral development and character education: A dialogue (125-143). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
  • Raths, L., Harmin, M., & Simon, S. (1978). Values and teaching: Working with values in the classroom (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
  • Rogers, C. (1969). Freedom to learn, Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values, New York: Free Press.
  • Scriven, M. (1966). Primary philosophy, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Sears, R., Maccoby, E., & Levin, H. (in collaboration with E. Lowell, P. Sears, & J.Whiting. (1957, 1976). Patterns of child rearing, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Simon, S., Howe, L., & Kirschenbaum, H. (1972). Values clarification: A handbook of practical strategies for teachers and students, New York: Hart.
  • Simon, S., & Kirschenbaum, H. (Eds.). (1973). Readings in values clarifications, Minneapolis, MN: Winston.
  • Solomon, D., Schaps, E. Watson, M, & Battistich, V. (1992). Creating caring school and classroom communities for all student. In R. Villa, J. Thousand, W. Stainback, & S. Stainback. F rom restructuring for caring and effective education: An administrative guide to creating heterogeneous schools, Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co. Retrieved December 1997, from,
  • Sullivan, H.S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry, New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Sullivan, H.S., Grant, M., & Grant, J. (1953). The development of interpersonal maturity: Applications of delinquency. Psychiatry, 20, 373-385.
  • Superka, D., Ahrens, C., & Hedstrom, J. (1976). Values education sourcebook, Boulder, CO: Social Science Education Consortium.
  • The Character Education Partnership, Inc. (1996). Character education in U.S. schools: The new consensus (Book excerpt).U.S. News and World Report On-line. Retrieved December 1997, from,
  • The Council for Global Education. (1997). Moral education: A parent’s questionnaire, Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved, December 1997, from,
  • Walker, L. (1991). Sex differences in moral reasoning. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development ( Vol 2, pp.333-364). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Whetzel.D. (1992). The Secretary of Labor’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills, ERIC Digest. Retrieved December 1997, from files/scansrpt.html,
  • Whiting, J. (1961). Socialization process and personality. In F. Hsu (Ed.), Psychological anthropology (355-399). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
  • Wynne, E. (1989). Transmitting traditional values in contemporary schools. In L. Nucci, Moral development and character education: A dialogue (pp.19-36). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corp.
  • Wynne, E., & Ryan, K. (1992). Reclaiming our schools: A handbook on teaching character, academics, and discipline. New York: Merrill.

What are the five value framework?

Responding to this research gap, the article presents a value framework consisting of five different kinds of value: economic, enjoyment, social, harmony and influence value.

What are the principles of value-based?

From Values to Action: The Four Principles of Values-Based Leadership Get full access to From Values to Action: The Four Principles of Values-Based Leadership and 60K+ other titles, with a free 10-day trial of O’Reilly. There are also live events, courses curated by job role, and more.

  • After more than thirty years in business and having had the opportunity to serve in many leadership roles, I believe that the path to becoming a values-based leader begins and ends with what I call the four principles of values-based leadership.
  • These principles are self-reflection, balance, true self-confidence, and genuine humility.

The principles are interconnected, each building on and contributing to the others. Together, they form a solid foundation for values-based leadership. At first glance, the four principles of values-based leadership may seem simplistic. However, they are not simple to implement.

  • They represent a lifelong discipline that will challenge you, but will always bring you,
  • Get From Values to Action: The Four Principles of Values-Based Leadership now with the O’Reilly learning platform.
  • O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.

Get Mark Richards’s Software Architecture Patterns ebook to better understand how to design components—and how they should interact.

What is the difference between values based and ethical practice?

Values are ideals of someone (or a group) about what is good or bad (or desirable or undesirable). Ethics is all about reasoning how to do the right action. Values motivate, while morals and ethics constrain.

What is the value practice?

Practice, Value, and Principle: These Three Will Change How You See the World Think of who you want to be | Photo by on Practice is action, the specific acts you commit and decisions you make in different situations. Value is the reason why, your logic and reasoning to do something. Think of it as the paths you take in life. Principle is the foundation, the core, what determines right and wrong. Photo by on

Why is values based practice important?

Abstract – Background The provision of health care is inseparable from universal values such as caring, helping and compassion. Consideration for individual values, particularly those of the patient, has also been increasing. However, such consideration is difficult within the context of modern health care, where complex and conflicting values are often in play.

  • This is particularly so when a patient’s values seem to be at odds with evidence-based practice or widely shared ethical principles, or when a health professional’s personal values may compromise the care provided.
  • Suggested new framework Values-based practice, a framework developed originally in the domain of mental health, maintains that values are pervasive and powerful parameters influencing decisions about health, clinical practice and research, and that their impact is often underestimated.

Although it shares starting points with other approaches to values, it suggests that our current approaches lead us to ignore some important manifestations of values at both the general level, as relevant in legal, policy and research contexts, as well as at the individual level, as relevant in clinical practice.

delivery of health care ethics evidence-based medicine, trends models, theoretical professional-patient relations social values

Received July 4, 2004. Revision received September 23, 2004. Accepted December 23, 2005.

© British Journal of General Practice, 2006.

View Full Text

What is the value based approach to ethics?

Whereas the compliance-based approach focuses on the imposition of external control and compliance with policies and rules, the value-based approach focuses on the development of integrity and requires individuals to internalise ethical values.