Health Blog

Tips | Recommendations | Reviews

Is Healthcare Two Words?

Is Healthcare Two Words
‘Health care—two words—refers to a provider’s actions. Healthcare—one word —is a system.

Is healthcare one word or two in the UK?

Trick to Remember the Difference – Here’s a helpful trick to remember health care vs. healthcare, For now, healthcare is still not accepted as standard in American English, despite its increasing popularity. At least in formal writing, you will want to stick with health care as a noun and health-care as an adjective for American audiences.

As I mentioned above, place like The AP Stylebook still require the two-word health care, For British audiences, healthcare is an accepted adjective, but health care is still more common as a noun. Remember that healthcare is a compound adjective in British English, much like another British English adjective, gobsmacked,

This memorable term, which is spelled as a single word, should help you remember to spell healthcare as a single-word adjective in British English.

Is health care one word or two Chicago style?

The AP would say that health care is two words ; the Chicago Manual of Style, popular in academia, would write that as 2 words, but agree with the premise.

What is UK healthcare called?

An Overview of the United Kingdom Healthcare System – The United Kingdom has a universal healthcare system called the National Health Service or NHS. The NHS is responsible for all aspects of the U.K. healthcare system, Today, the NHS is also one of the largest public health systems in the world.

What is the American spelling of hospital?

  1. a large building where people who are ill or injured are given medical treatment and care
    • to/into (the) hospital (British English) He had to go to/into hospital for treatment.
    • (North American English) He had to go to/into the hospital for treatment.
    • I’m going to the hospital to visit my brother.
    • to be admitted to/into (the) hospital
    • Arrangements have been made for his admission to (the) hospital.
    • He’s been taken to (the) hospital for tests.
    • The injured were rushed to (the) hospital in an ambulance.
    • to leave (the) hospital
    • to be discharged/released from (the) hospital
    • to visit a hospital
    • in (the) hospital He died in hospital,
    • He was treated in the hospital for burns.
    • I spent four days in hospital.
    • I was in the hospital for four days.
    • in a hospital She works in a hospital in New York.
    • out of (the) hospital She came out of the hospital this morning.
    • at a hospital Doctors at the hospital decided to keep her in overnight.
    • a private/local hospital
    • a psychiatric/maternity hospital
    • a children’s hospital
    • The procedure requires a two-to-three-night hospital stay,
    • There is an urgent need for more hospital beds,
    • hospital admissions
    • hospital staff
    • a hospital ward/room
    • hospital treatment/care

    British/American hospital hospital

    • In British English you say to hospital or in hospital when you talk about somebody being there as a patient:
      • I had to go to hospital.
      • She spent two weeks in hospital


    • In North American English you need to use the :
      • I had to go to the hospital.
      • She spent two weeks in the hospital.

    see also community hospital, cottage hospital, teaching hospital Extra Examples

    • He has been readmitted to hospital.
    • He is in hospital recovering from a heart operation.
    • He was taken to hospital as a precaution.
    • He’s had to go into hospital rather suddenly.
    • How long will I have to stay in hospital?
    • I used to work as a cleaner in a hospital.
    • She works at the John Radcliffe Hospital.
    • We went to the hospital to visit my gran.
    • He was admitted to hospital complaining of chest pains.
    • She was discharged from hospital and allowed to go home.
    • There is a shortage of hospital beds.

    Topics Buildings a1, Healthcare a1 Oxford Collocations Dictionary adjective

    • community
    • district
    • local

    verb + hospital

    • go into
    • go to
    • rush somebody to

    hospital + noun

    • administrator
    • doctor
    • staff


    • at a/​the hospital
    • in (a/​the) hospital
    • to (a/​the) hospital


    • admission to hospital
    • admission to the hospital
    • a stay in hospital

    See full entry Word Origin Middle English (originally meaning a hospice run by the Knights Hospitallers in the 11th century): via Old French from medieval Latin hospitale, neuter of Latin hospitalis ‘hospitable’, from hospes, hospit- ‘host, guest’. Definitions on the go Look up any word in the dictionary offline, anytime, anywhere with the Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary app. Is Healthcare Two Words

See hospital in the Oxford Advanced American Dictionary See hospital in the Oxford Learner’s Dictionary of Academic English

Is healthcare universal in us?

United States – The United States does not have universal health insurance coverage. Nearly 92 percent of the population was estimated to have coverage in 2018, leaving 27.5 million people, or 8.5 percent of the population, uninsured. Movement toward securing the right to health care has been incremental.

  1. Employer-sponsored health insurance was introduced during the 1920s.
  2. It gained popularity after World War II when the government imposed wage controls and declared fringe benefits, such as health insurance, tax-exempt.
  3. In 2018, about 55 percent of the population was covered under employer-sponsored insurance.

In 1965, the first public insurance programs, Medicare and Medicaid, were enacted through the Social Security Act, and others followed. Medicare. Medicare ensures a universal right to health care for persons age 65 and older. Eligible populations and the range of benefits covered have gradually expanded.

In 1972, individuals under age 65 with long-term disabilities or end-stage renal disease became eligible. All beneficiaries are entitled to traditional Medicare, a fee-for-service program that provides hospital insurance (Part A) and medical insurance (Part B). Since 1973, beneficiaries have had the option to receive their coverage through either traditional Medicare or Medicare Advantage (Part C), under which people enroll in a private health maintenance organization (HMO) or managed care organization.

In 2003, Part D, a voluntary outpatient prescription drug coverage option provided through private carriers, was added to Medicare coverage. Medicaid. The Medicaid program first gave states the option to receive federal matching funding for providing health care services to low-income families, the blind, and individuals with disabilities.

Coverage was gradually made mandatory for low-income pregnant women and infants, and later for children up to age 18. Today, Medicaid covers 17.9 percent of Americans. As it is a state-administered, means-tested program, eligibility criteria vary by state. Individuals need to apply for Medicaid coverage and to re-enroll and recertify annually.

As of 2019, more than two-thirds of Medicaid beneficiaries were enrolled in managed care organizations. Children’s Health Insurance Program. In 1997, the Children’s Health Insurance Program, or CHIP, was created as a public, state-administered program for children in low-income families that earn too much to qualify for Medicaid but that are unlikely to be able to afford private insurance.

  1. Today, the program covers 9.6 million children.5 In some states, it operates as an extension of Medicaid; in other states, it is a separate program.
  2. Affordable Care Act.
  3. In 2010, the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or ACA, represented the largest expansion to date of the government’s role in financing and regulating health care.

Components of the law’s major coverage expansions, implemented in 2014, included:

  • requiring most Americans to obtain health insurance or pay a penalty (the penalty was later removed)
  • extending coverage for young people by allowing them to remain on their parents’ private plans until age 26
  • opening health insurance marketplaces, or exchanges, which offer premium subsidies to lower- and middle-income individuals
  • expanding Medicaid eligibility with the help of federal subsidies (in states that chose this option).

The ACA resulted in an estimated 20 million gaining coverage, reducing the share of uninsured adults aged 19 to 64 from 20 percent in 2010 to 12 percent in 2018. Read more

Is day care two words?

Adjective day·care or day-care. of, relating to, or providing day care: daycare center;day-care program.

What writing style is used in healthcare?

(American Psychological Association) APA Style provides a foundation for effective scholarly communication because it helps writers present their ideas in a clear, precise, and inclusive manner.

What is the compound noun of healthcare?

LawProse Lesson #154: Compound words: Is it ‘healthcare,’ ‘ health-care,’ or ‘health care’? Compound words: Is it healthcare, health-care, or health care? The better practice is to write it as a solid, unhyphenated word: healthcare.

What is the difference between healthcare in the US and the UK?

Comparative twin study: Access to healthcare services in the NHS and the American private insurance system What the NHS will ultimately look like under Conservative party leadership has yet to be determined. But the potential impact of American private healthcare interests remains part of the discussion.

  • There continues to be ongoing conversation around the strong interest the American health industry has in the UK market.
  • During his visit earlier in the year, US President Donald Trump again raised the issue of opening the National Health Service (NHS) to the American private health insurance market.

This revives ongoing debates about the benefits of universal health coverage systems like the NHS compared to the benefits of America’s largely private, insurance-driven model. This is of particular concern because while Americans are assured that they receive the world’s best healthcare, review of health outcomes show Americans’ health often fares comparatively poorly to other high-income countries, despite the US spending significantly more.

Furthermore, there is mounting evidence that the US healthcare system can bankrupt even well insured individuals. However, there is little in the literature to reflect comparative experiences of those using the two systems. That’s where we come in. Our experiences are highly idiosyncratic, of course—but we are identical twins, both having been treated for breast cancer within the past five years.

Nora, a London-based university professor, received her care through the NHS; Nancy, a US government employee (with what is considered in the US an excellent employer insurance plan), was treated in the US. We both received treatment at well-regarded university teaching hospitals.

  1. Here’s our experience : Medical history Moving to the UK from the US in 2008 aged 55, Nora enrolled in the NHS, with the understanding that if needed, for-profit, private healthcare was available.
  2. This was not necessary.
  3. Assigned to a local GP, in an initial check-up, Nora reported a medical history that included a strong family history of breast cancer.

This initiated a referral to a genetic counsellor and the local hospital’s breast clinic, where she received annual mammograms starting in 2009. In 2012, a routine mammography identified a lump and she was called back for a needle biopsy. Identification of cancer led to two lumpectomies (two days in hospital per lumpectomy) however there was difficulty in identifying margins of the lesion and after consultations with her surgeon and surgical team, Nora elected to have a double mastectomy.

  1. This was undertaken in 2014, during a six day hospital stay.
  2. Nora took six weeks off work, (and had the option to stay out longer), her time off covered by her employer.
  3. She continues to have routine follow-up including anti-cancer medication, annual check-ups, and bi-annual bone density screenings.
  4. Current status: In remission.

US based Nancy works in Washington, DC, but retains an apartment in her hometown of New York City. In part, this is because prior to the 2010 Affordable Care Act, (widely known as Obamacare) a previous bout of breast cancer in her early 40s meant she had a “pre-existing condition.” She was therefore ineligible for healthcare coverage in many American states.

  • Since New York was one of the states that did not exclude Nancy from coverage, she retained it as her primary residence despite working hundreds of miles away.
  • In other words, access to health insurance has been a factor in determining her job/career options since 1994.
  • Joining the Federal Government in 2007, Nancy enrolled in one of several pre-selected private health insurance plans where the employer pays 60% of the premium and employees are responsible for the 40% “matching payment.” Employee payments are automatically deducted from bi-weekly paychecks.

Plans vary, but most also include an “out-of-pocket deductible” of several hundred to several thousand dollars per year—costs that must be paid by the employee before insurance “kicks in.” Nancy’s plan permitted her to retain her New York-based healthcare providers, including her long-time oncologist.

  1. In late 2015, after 20 years in remission, Nancy’s annual mammography detected a lesion in one breast.
  2. Over a four month period, Nancy underwent several MRIs, two biopsies, and an outpatient lumpectomy, followed by a month-long course of radiation.
  3. To minimize time off work, with the permission of her New York based oncologist, she moved her post surgical radiation care to a Washington, DC hospital near her office.

This necessitated her personally identifying and establishing relationships with a second medical team, coordinating a transfer of her medical records, and familiarizing herself with a new medical facility. In the end, Nancy took only two weeks off, in part by scheduling “crack-of-dawn” radiation appointments so she could still report for a full day of work.

  1. She continues to have regular check-ups.
  2. Current status: In remission.
  3. Accessing the systems General taxation and mandatory salary deductions pay for the NHS, which supports not only healthcare, but also some dental care, some social services, and public health initiatives.
  4. All treatment is free at point of delivery.

For Nora this ranged from her initial genetic counselling to her most recent annual check-up. No bills were sent or presented to her at any point. Because Nora was over age 60, all medications also were, and continue to be, free. (Under age 60, England’s NHS now charges £9.00—US $ 11.75—for any medical prescription).

  • In the US, although Nancy was “fully covered” by her employer’s insurance plan, she was still responsible for 40% of the annual insurance company’s enrolment premium—$3,500 per year.
  • Other expenses were covered on a complicated, opaque formula arrived at through negotiations between her healthcare providers and insurance company.

Significantly different from the NHS plan, under the US private healthcare system, Nancy is largely responsible for sorting out all payments at point of delivery. Some procedures and physician visits were fully covered; others were covered at varying percentages of the total cost; and occasionally, were disallowed.

  1. In theory, the highest amount Nancy was responsible for should have totalled no more than $5,000 “annual out-of-pocket maximum deducible.” Since her diagnosis and treatment extended over two calendar years (December-March), she should have paid no more than $10,000 towards uncovered charges.
  2. In the end, however, she paid more than $14,000 over and above the substantial amount already paid by her insurance company and her annual $3500 premium.

Nancy, a single woman with no partner to assist her, found that in addition to facing a life-threatening disease, the financial hardships she encountered, even as a fully covered patient, and the stress created by the ongoing need to manage, negotiate, and often correct bills from doctors, hospitals, lab visits and insurance company was incredibly taxing.

  • Some providers refused to deal with insurance companies, only accepting direct payments: i.e.
  • They insisted that she pay them “up front” and then submit their bill to her insurance company for reimbursement.
  • For example, her surgeon, to whom she was referred by her oncologist, refused to deal with insurance companies.

His office quoted her a price of “between $7,000 to $10,000” for a lumpectomy, although when she expressed concern about affording this, the office secretary assured her that his final bill “would probably be less.” After numerous phone calls—and obtaining the mandatory “pre-approval” from her insurance company, Nancy had the operation as an outpatient.

  • This was apparently done to keep costs down for her insurance company—no explanation was offered as to why this was an outpatient rather than inpatient procedure.
  • Following the operation, the surgeon’s office “worked with her on billing” and ultimately, only charged $6,900.
  • Her insurance company sent her $3,900 with which to pay the surgeon, leaving her to pay the $3,000 balance.

(For mysterious reasons, the insurance company also decided that only $1,302 of her $3,000 payment qualified towards fulfilling her annual $5,000 “out-of-pocket maximum.”) Fortunately, she had enough personal savings to pay this bill without obtaining a loan.

  1. Billing and payment issues continued throughout treatment.
  2. Would the insurance company cover the $4,600 oncologist-ordered Oncotype test to determine if chemotherapy was needed? Maybe, maybe not.
  3. While she waited several weeks for their ruling, she was required to submit an application to the California-based lab for “patient assistance” that included an intrusive questionnaire examining her private finances to see if she was eligible for their subsidized rate.

(She was finally approved for the subsidy and her insurance company did cover the test.) Many bills were only partially covered, leaving her responsible for tracking what had been paid by insurance, what she was responsible for, and how much of her payment the insurance company would apply to its enigmatic “out-of-pocket annual maximum.” For some procedures, 100% of her payment was applied towards the maximum, but for others, the applied amount was 80% or less.

She had no idea why. Sometimes, she was able to “get a deal” from the hospitals’ billing departments by calling and paying her portion of an outstanding bill in full with her credit card. However, this only worked if she called and personally negotiated with diverse billing departments (blood lab, surgical, radiology, etc.).

Having surgery at one hospital and radiation at another meant dealing with billing departments at both. It also increased the number of mistakes. For example, halfway through radiation, she received a bill for nearly $40,000 from the second hospital because their billing department had erred in submitting her insurance information and unilaterally decided she was uninsured.

  • This, too, was ultimately resolved in Nancy’s favour, but caused her weeks of worry waiting for the billing department to correct its error.
  • Nancy’s previous experience with cancer treatment in the 1990s made her aware of the need to keep meticulous records on payments to health providers and insurance companies.

She initially hoped that technological improvements over the past two decades would improve her experience. It did incrementally: this time it only took six months of focused attention after the end of treatment to sort out her finances rather than the two years needed to resolve bills from her previous bout with cancer.

  1. However, she continued to receive new, unanticipated bills for months: for example, an unexpected bill from her December 2015 surgery only arrived in May 2016.
  2. Discussion Obviously, this is an idiosyncratic comparison, but on behalf of both of us, we can say the following: cancer is always a daunting medical diagnosis.

To the list of life and death questions that any cancer patient reflects on, there are other issues—family, work, future—that all who face cancer must consider. Nora was able to confront many of these issues without worrying about a mounting pile of bills and ongoing monetary negotiations with her healthcare providers.

Nancy’s primary attention was focused on managing the complex financial issues surrounding her illness. While many US insurance companies and politicians loudly proclaim that national insurance systems such as the NHS “do not work,” in our experience, this is far from true. There are undoubtedly many problems with the NHS and the system itself is currently under severe strain.

But in the UK, access to healthcare is considered a right—not a privilege—and 64.6 million UK residents receive healthcare free at the point of delivery every year. There are other issues involved in a universal healthcare system that receive less attention.

  • For example, in the UK, people, young and old, change jobs without fear of losing healthcare for themselves or their families.
  • But for millions of Americans, health insurance is provided by their employer.
  • Should they, their partner or children need care—cancer, diabetes, a diagnosis of autism—the condition may be covered only so long as they stay in their current job.

Prior to the Affordable Care Act, such people were often locked in a job for years—even decades—because they could not afford to lose their current insurance and a new employer’s insurance would not cover their pre-existing conditions. Obamacare allows millions with pre-existing conditions coverage for the first time, but not all those with pre-existing conditions enrol and coverage differs by state.

Furthermore the Trump administration has clearly stated they seek to end the entire programme. Another concern in the US is that, even for those with excellent insurance, most practices accept only some but rarely all, insurance plans. Patients must “shop around” and often travel far distances, to find a healthcare provider that will accept their specific insurance plan.

This barrier to healthcare will likely increase if Obamacare is taken out of the picture. In the US, even those with excellent insurance plans, like Nancy, still struggle under a system that needs serious review; and those who cannot afford health insurance (or enough health insurance), go without or delay seeking care, sometimes with life-threatening consequences.

Health insurance companies can decide what they choose to cover, and as in Nancy’s case, negotiate with doctors and hospitals to establish what percentage of medical costs they will cover and what will be covered by patients—even fully insured patients. Ultimately, the issue is not just about healthcare or about money.

At its heart, we argue, this is a human rights issue and a social justice concern. It is a question of what type of society we want to be. In the UK, a national system of healthcare, paid for by all citizens through taxes, provides a universal safety net.

The US has settled for a complicated mix of private insurance and government subsidized programmes, often managed by private companies. The result is not just whether one has or does not have insurance. In the US, even for those with excellent insurance like Nancy, the issue also is the amount of time, energy and frustration a person or a family faces in navigating a labyrinthine and often unforgiving for-profit system.

One more reflection Nancy incurred an additional set of health expenses following surgery, during the months she spent negotiating her health care bills. Her previously unremarkable blood pressure skyrocketed. An additional round of doctors’ appointments, medicines, and bills (with inevitable co-payments) were needed to keep her blood pressure in check.

Nora had no blood pressure problems, but then, she did not face piles of bills and was not involved in dozens of phone calls arguing with insurance companies and hospital billing offices. Her only additional expense was that, because food in her hospital was adequate but not outstanding, her husband paid £6.95 for a ready meal from Marks & Spencer’s the night before discharge.

Her taxi ride home was covered by the NHS. Nora Ellen Groce is a Professor in the Department of Epidemiology and Health Care at University College London. She holds a PhD in Anthropology and works on issues related to global health and international development, with particular expertise in global disability research Nancy Groce holds a PhD in American Studies and has worked public sector jobs in the arts, culture and humanities throughout her career.

Competing interests : None declared Acknowledgement : We thank the following people for review of this manuscript: Lawrence C Kaplan, MD; Ellie Cole, MSc; Helena Fahie, MSc. References:

The Guardian. Nov 3, 2019. Opinion: The Observer view on the risk the Tory party poses to the NHS. Fortune. There’s One Subject in the UK that’s as Toxic as Brexit: Trump just waded into it.

June 4, 2019. Sawyer B, McDermott D.2019. Petersen-Kaiser Health System Tracker. Papanicolas I; Woskie L; Jha A.2018. Health Care Spending in the United States and Other High-Income Countries.

JAMA.2018;319(10):1024-1039. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.1150 Dobkin C, Finkelstein A, Kluendo R, Notowidigo M; Myth and Measurement: The Case of Medical Bankruptcies. New England Journal of Medicine. March 22: 378 (12):1076-1078. US Government.2010.

  • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
  • Accessed March 27, 2019.
  • The Guardian.2018.
  • Doctors at Breaking Point in Underfunded NHS.
  • Letter to the Editor.
  • Https://; NHS.
  • NSH England – About the NHS England.
  • Https:// Accessed: April 20, 2019.

: Comparative twin study: Access to healthcare services in the NHS and the American private insurance system

Is health care a compound noun?

A Word, Please: Looking at ‘one word, two words or hyphenated’ issue Health care, healthcare or health-care? Make up, makeup or make-up? Water ski, water-ski or waterski? Cell phone, cellphone or cell-phone? A lot of questions posed in this column elicit the answer: There’s no right answer.

Different dictionaries, different publications and different industries do things different ways. So you get to choose. The serial comma is the classic example. News media prefer just one comma in “red, white and blue,” book and magazine publishing usually prefers two: “red, white, and blue.” Both are correct in their respective editing styles.

But when it comes to the “one word, two words or hyphenated” conundrum, it’s possible to mess up. Very possible. Here’s an example: “Engineers and programmers makeup the bulk of the association’s membership.” Fascinatingly, very few native English speakers would make that mistake.

People who’ve never spent a second pondering this stuff seem to know instinctively that “make up” works better in that sentence. The user might explain his choice like this: “You’re not talking about something’s makeup. You’re talking about making something up.” Poorly articulated as such an explanation would be, it’s right.

To make something up is to use the verb form. To talk about a person’s personality makeup or her application of lipstick and mascara is to use the noun form. These are called phrasal verbs, by the way — verbs of more than one word, usually a plain verb plus a preposition, in which the added word significantly changes the meaning.

(That is, the “up” in “make up” means something different from plain-old “make,” just as the “by” in “get by” makes it different from “get.”) To know whether your term is “open” (two words), “closed” (one word) or hyphenated, there’s a simple two-step process. Step 1: Identify its part of speech — noun, verb, adjective.

Step 2: Check a dictionary, noting the part-of-speech designations and keeping in mind that dictionaries sometimes disagree with each other. Verbs are usually open: “tune up.” Nouns are often closed, “tuneup,” or hyphenated, “self-esteem.” Some adjectives are in the dictionary, like “good-looking,” but most compound adjectives aren’t.

  1. Luckily, they’re easy to manage.
  2. Let’s start with “healthcare.” Webster’s New World College Dictionary, one of the two most influential dictionaries in publishing, lists the noun as one word.
  3. So if you’re talking about getting healthcare, that’s the one-word noun.
  4. Webster’s has no entry for an adjective, so what should you do if you want to mention, say, “healthcare services” or “healthcare policy”? Well, in English, we use nouns as adjectives.

They’re called attributive nouns and good examples include “paint store” and “road work.” Just slap the noun in front of another noun and it’s understood you mean the first one is now working adjectivally. Dictionaries don’t always agree. Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate, the other most influential dictionary in publishing, prefers to treat “health care” as two words.

To make it or any two-word form an adjective, apply the basic rule of hyphenation: whenever a compound modifier — that is, a two-word adjective — comes before a noun, hyphenate it if you believe the hyphen makes it clearer: “She has good health-care insurance.”By the way, even Webster’s New World acknowledges that the noun “health care” can be written as two words, though that dictionary’s clear preference is one word.As for the others I’ve mentioned: Both Merriam’s and Webster’s New World prefer the noun “makeup” as one word, no hyphen, though they agree that the verb is “make up.”They agree that the piece of sports equipment known as a “water ski” is an open compound, even though the verb and its derivatives are hyphenated: “That water-skier sure knows how to water-ski on his water skis.”The dictionaries also agree that “cell phone” is a two-word noun, so you’re free to hyphenate it if you’re using it as an adjective, “cell-phone manufacturer,” or not, “cell phone manufacturer.”-

JUNE CASAGRANDE is the author of “The Best Punctuation Book, Period.” She can be reached at, : A Word, Please: Looking at ‘one word, two words or hyphenated’ issue

What is the correct spelling of health?

‘ Health.’ Thesaurus, Merriam-Webster,

Is health and WellBeing one word?

Wait a it WellBeing or Well-being? Actually, it’s both and then some! According to Merriam-Webster, “well-being” defined as the state of being happy, healthy, or successful is written with a hyphen. However, thanks to the New York Times bestseller WellBeing: The Five Essential Elements written by Rath and Harter, well-being has been written in many publications as one word, no hyphen.

At ISU, we are using both. In shifting from wellness to well-being, we decided to give the program the title ISU WellBeing, that’s well-being as one word, italicized, no hyphen, and a capital “B” for being! But, as you may have noticed, when we use the term well-being, we go with the authority, Merriam-Webster.

So, that’s it folks – ISU WellBeing is moving from wellness to well-being and enjoying the fun in just being well! Wellbeing Category: : Wait a it WellBeing or Well-being?