What Are The Three Criteria For Evaluating Healthcare Systems?

Efficiency, effectiveness, equity (E 3 ). Evaluating hospital performance in three dimensions☆,☆☆

What are the criterion for evaluating health information?

Evaluation of Health Information on the Web: Home There are six broad criteria for evaluation of health information you find on the web. They are: Credibility, Content, Disclosure, Links, Design and Interactivity, Each of the criteria is described in more depth in the boxes below.

1. These criteria were originally defined in published in 1998.
2. Variations on the criteria have been used widely ever since.
3. And as a general rule of thumb when looking for health information, stick to reputable sites from educational instututions, government sources, and health related associations and societies,

: Evaluation of Health Information on the Web: Home

What are the criteria for high quality care?

Quality health services should be: effective; safe; people-centred; timely; equitable; integrated; and efficient.

What is system performance in healthcare?

What Is the Scope of Health Services Research? – Health system performance has three dimensions: accessibility, quality, and efficiency. Together these determine the extent to which we attain the achievable in health care. Accessibility describes the extent to which patients are able to get the care they need, when they need it.

1. Quality describes the extent to which the right care is delivered in the right way.
2. Efficiency describes the extent to which accessibility and effectiveness are optimized in relation to the resources expended.
3. HSR is concerned with measuring these quantities, understanding the factors that influence them, and discovering and evaluating ways of enhancing them.

The scope of HSR in oncology covers the entire continuum of cancer care. In a systematic cross-sectional study of 1,113 HSR publications from 2009, the majority of HSR focused on active treatment (32%), with fewer studies addressing survivorship (19%) or screening (16%), and even fewer than that focused on diagnosis/assessment (10%), palliation (8%), or prevention (4%) 1 Across this continuum, the focus of HSR was most commonly on quality of care (56%), with fewer studies focused on accessibility (25%), efficiency (5%), or general well-being of subjects (14%).1 Figure 12-1 shows a general framework for a program of HSR aimed at improving some specific aspect of health system performance.

The first step is to select, define, and validate appropriate indicators of the aspect of performance that has been targeted for investigation. The next two steps are to: (1) develop methods of measuring system performance in terms of the chosen indicator(s) and (2) prescribe standards or targets for system performance in terms of the chosen indicators.

These two steps, which often involve the use of different methods, can sometimes be undertaken in parallel. Once standards have been set and methods for measuring performance have been established and validated, it becomes possible to evaluate the performance of the system against the standards.

This in turn permits further explanatory studies aimed at identifying factors that are associated with better or worse performance. This information can be used to design interventions aimed at improving performance. The interventions may then be implemented and systematically evaluated. Interventions may be refined through further cycles of improvement before they are suitable for dissemination and incorporation into routine practice.

Read full chapter URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323240987000125

What are the 5 criteria of evaluation sources?

Research Guides: External Analysis Research: 5. Evaluating Sources As a student, you will be gathering information from a variety of types of sources for your research projects including books, newspaper articles, magazine articles, specialized databases, and websites.

As you examine each source, it is important to evaluate each source to determine the quality of the information provided within it. Common evaluation criteria include: purpose and intended audience, authority and credibility, accuracy and reliability, currency and timeliness, and objectivity or bias.

Each of these criteria will be explained in more detail below.

What are the five 5 main criteria used for evaluation of information resources?

With this brief introduction to evaluating sources, we will use a list of five critical criteria: AAOCC ( Authority, Accuracy, Objectivity, Currency, and Coverage).

What are the system performance evaluation criteria?

Systems performance criteria are a means of organising the information for evaluating the interrelationships among the three systems performance variables. Performance evaluation is based on five criteria: (1) costs, (2) productivity, (3) effectiveness, (4) cost-effectiveness and (5) efficiency.

What are quality performance indicators in healthcare?

Mission – The Quality Indicators (QIs) are measures of health care quality that use readily available hospital inpatient administrative data. AHRQ develops Quality Indicators to provide health care decisionmakers with tools to assess their data. Visit the AHRQuality Indicators™ Web site,

What are the top 6 evaluation criteria?

Applying Evaluation Criteria Thoughtfully – Relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, and sustainability are widely used evaluation criteria, particularly in international development co-operation. They help to determine the merit or worth of various interventions, such as strategies, policies, programmes or projects.

This guidance aims to help evaluators and others to better understand those criteria, and improve their use. It starts by describing what they are, and how they are meant to be used. Then the definitions and concepts underpinning each criterion are explained. Finally, examples provide the reader with concrete ideas for using them.

The criteria were originally laid out in the early 2000s by the Network on Development Evaluation (EvalNet) of the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Although they have been widely used in evaluation, and beyond, this document is the first to comprehensively explore the concepts in detail, explain their intended use and offer practical guidance.

Click to access: Click to access in HTML WEB Click to download PDF – 2.00MB PDF Click to download EPUB – 1.32MB ePUB Click to Read online and share READ

What are the 4 main criteria when evaluating resources?

Key Takeaways –

Any resource—print, human, or electronic—used to support your research topic must be evaluated for its credibility and reliability.Evaluate sources of information by examining them for authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage.

What are the five means of evaluating information?

This tutorial video will help you critically evaluate sources using these five criteria: authority, accuracy, currency, relevance, and objectivity.

What do the 3 C’s stand for in health?

It can be difficult to think clearly in the midst of an emergency. Training your brain before you find yourself in a high-pressure situation may help you save a life or potentially help someone in pain. There are three basic C’s to remember—check, call, and care. When it comes to first aid, there are three P’s to remember—preserve life, prevent deterioration, and promote recovery.

Why are the 3 C’s important?

Let Students Plan Reward Celebrations – When these reading goals are reached, it’s time to celebrate. Initially, I suggested popcorn and a movie, and offered to bring in the supplies. But one student had other ideas. “Can we plan the party?” Edwin asked.

Often one of my more vocally negative students, it was strange for Edwin to volunteer for anything, so, hesitantly, I agreed. Edwin morphed into an entirely different student. He took control, assigned jobs, and became an enthusiastic leader, demonstrating skills I didn’t know he had. Students volunteered to bring in games and treats.

Some students made signs and decorated a banner. The entire class was engaged, productive, and proud. Like giving a handmade gift, taking ownership and planning their own classroom celebration was a much more meaningful and satisfying reward. The cooperation, leadership, and collaboration my students displayed far exceeded any lesson I could have planned.

What are the 6 evaluation criteria checklist?

By admin on Thu, 11/15/2018 – 12:57

Home Authority Accuracy Objectivity Currency Coverage Appearance

Because of the hodge-podge of information on the Internet, it is very important you develop evaluation skills to assist you in identifying quality Web pages. There are six (6) criteria that should be applied when evaluating any Web site: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, coverage, and appearance.

1. For each criterion, there are several questions to be asked.
2. The more questions you can answer “yes”, the more likely the Web site is one of quality.
3. What about the news? The Web is awash in, among many things, both real information and utter nonsense.
4. Surfed on into or been directed to a news story? Check its Left/Center/Right rating here at AllSides,

For lists of news sources ranging from left to right to satire, check out Media Bias/Fact Check, A checklist on how to identify fake news in ten questions (pdf), Science vs. pseudoscience? Here is another checklist,

Below is a chart listing key questions for each of the six criteria.

Authority	Is it clear who is responsible for the contents of the page? Is there a way of verifying the legitimacy of the organization, group, company or individual? Is there any indication of the author’s qualifications for writing on a particular topic? Is the information from sources known to be reliable?
Accuracy	Are the sources for factual information clearly listed so they can be verified in another source? Is the information free of grammatical, spelling, and other typographical errors?
Objectivity	Does the content appear to contain any evidence of bias? Is there a link to a page describing the goals or purpose of the sponsoring organization or company? If there is any advertising on the page, is it clearly differentiated from the informational content?
Currency	Are there dates on the page to indicate when the page was written, when the page was first placed on the Web, or when the page was last revised?
Coverage	Are these topics successfully addressed, with clearly presented arguments and adequate support to substantiate them? Does the work update other sources, substantiate other materials you have read, or add new information? Is the target audience identified and appropriate for your needs?
Appearance	Does the site look well organized? Do the links work? Does the site appear well maintained?

a) Is it clear who is responsible for the contents of the page? WHY IMPORTANT? – It is critical to relate the ideas you find at a site to a particular author, organization, or business. In this way, there is a degree of accountability for any of the ideas expressed.

1. Once the individual or organization responsible for the content is known, you can then begin to look at other clues to help you ascertain credibilities, such as credentials and reputation.
2. Be especially wary of sites in which the author or sponsoring organization is not clearly stated.
3. Note, the sponsor of a site is often responsible for the content.

You can quickly determine a site’s sponsor by looking for references at the top and/or bottom of the page. In addition, the first part of the address of a site, called the domain, contains information that allows you to get a general idea of the sponsor.

For example, having the domain name,edu (e.g. http://www.nmu.edu) means the site is hosted by an educational institution,,com means a commercial enterprise,,gov means a government agency, and,org means an organization, such as the National Rifle Association. It is important to note that some sponsors are not directly responsible for the content on their site, such as personal pages hosted by universities or commercial Internet Service Providers (e.g.

AT&T, UP.net, etc.). You can identify these pages because they are often represented by a tilde (~) in their address (e.g. http:www.nmu.edu/~kmcdonou/home.html). If you want to find out specifically who is hosting a site, you can remove part of the address from your current page and go back to the root address.

1. For example, let’s say you are looking at a site on the Renaissance, located at http://www.learner.org/exhibits/renaissance/,
2. If there is no indication who is sponsoring this site you can go back to http://www.learner.org/,
3. Here you discover the Renaissance site is a project sponsored by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting with funding from the Annenberg School of Communications.

b) Is there a way of verifying the legitimacy of the organization, group, company or individual? That is, is there a phone number or postal address to contact for more information? (Simply an e-mail address is not enough), WHY IMPORTANT? – Anyone with an Internet Service Provider (AT&T, UP.net, NMU, etc.) can put up a Web page.

1. As a result, you need to have some idea whether the group claiming responsibility for the information on the Web site is legitimate.
2. A phone number or postal address allows you to contact the group or company and ask for more information.
3. Be wary of sites that do not provide contact information.
4. Because it is difficult to verify the legitimacy of an individual, personal home pages may be useful sources for personal opinion but must be used with caution when citing them as a source for factual information.

c) Is there any indication of the author’s qualifications (either an individual or an organization) for writing on a particular topic? WHY IMPORTANT? – If you find an article describing the ecology of black bears, you need to know if the author is qualified to speak intelligently on this topic.

Clues include an author’s educational background (e.g. PhD in Wildlife Ecology from the University of Michigan), current position (Wildlife Biologist for the Department of Natural Resources), or reputation (Nobel Laureate in Biology, member of the National Academy of Sciences, etc.). If the content is provided by an organization, you might want to consider if the organization known and respected.

d) Is the information from sources known to be reliable? WHY IMPORTANT? – Statements from established and reputable organizations almost always have been seen and approved by several people. As a result, this check and balance system helps prevent the release of unsound information.

Government sites (.gov) are very good examples of organizations where information is disseminated through this type of system. For other organizations, it can be difficult sometimes to determine if they are established and reputable. Clues to look for include the date an organization was founded, the number of members, their mission, the types of publications they produce, whether they have annual conferences, etc.

Generally, established organizations have been around for a while and have a good membership base. One way of determining the reputation of an organization is to examine how it is referred to in newspaper or periodical articles. You can use the library’s subscription databases to search for articles in newspapers and periodicals on a particular organization.

Other sources known for quality include online journals and magazines. Most journals use a peer review process, whereby several individuals evaluate and critique an article, allowing the author to make revisions before an editor makes a final decision on whether it is published. Popular magazines, although not having as stringent of a review process, still have editors who evaluate articles before they are published.

As a result of this editorial process, these publications will tend to be more reliable or trustworthy than information found on a personal Web site. In regards to the quality of an information source, it is important to note the difference between an unofficial comment made by an individual at an organization and an official statement by the same organization.

• When Bill Smith, employee of the National Weather Service, says on National Public Radio “I believe this will be a bad year for hurricanes,” this information is based on his opinion and may be no more reliable than your own.
• This is significantly different than a statement on the National Weather Service’s Web site, “This is going to be a bad year for hurricanes.” The employee is speaking for himself; whereas a statement in the name of NWS represents the official position of NWS.

An official position will have been reviewed or edited before being released. a) Are the sources for factual information clearly listed so they can be verified in another source? WHY IMPORTANT? – A source of information is known to be scholarly when it provides references to the information presented.

1. In this way, the reader can confirm whether the information is accurate or the author’s conclusions reasonable.
2. A page without references still may be useful as an example of the ideas of an individual, organization, or business, but not as source of factual information.
3. B) Is the information free of grammatical, spelling, and other typographical errors? WHY IMPORTANT? – Such errors not only indicate a lack of attention and effort, but also can actually produce inaccuracies in information.

Whether the errors come from carelessness or ignorance, they both put the information or writer in an unfavorable light. a) Does the content appear to contain any evidence of bias? WHY IMPORTANT? – If the content contains bias, only one point of view is being presented.

1. This may not be bad depending on your needs.
2. For example, in writing a position paper on gun control, you may want to compare the extreme pro-gun position of the National Rifle Association, with that of the anti-gun organization Cease Fire or a more balanced report published by an independent think tank site (such as the Brookings Institute).

Regardless, you will want to know if the information is biased or not in order to make appropriate decisions on how to use it. One way of determining this is by relying on your own experience and knowledge to determine if the information appears believable or reasonable.

In your experience, does the information make sense? If an individual claims that one of every 3 Americans have an alcohol problem, is it true that a third of all your friends and family members have a drinking problem? Another way of detecting bias is assessing how true the information appears relative to other reliable sources of information.

You should make sure you corroborate any position you find with other positions published in other sources, such as periodicals or books. In this way you can discover where a position appears on the continuum. NOTE: the domain name (as mentioned under Authority) can help you determine the possible slant or potential bias of the information contained in a site.

For example, the benefits of a new drug might be more objective coming from a government web site (.gov), such as the Food and Drug Administration, rather than those offered by its manufacturer, Bristal-Myers Squibb (.com). Directly related to bias is the concept of fairness. Good information sources will use a calm, reasoned tone to present information in a balanced manner.

Pay attention to the tone and be cautious of sites that contain highly emotional writing. Writing that is overly critical, attacking, or spiteful often indicates an irrational and unfair presentation rather than a reasoned argument. b) Is there a link to a page describing the goals or purpose of the sponsoring organization or company? WHY IMPORTANT? – The goals or purpose of a group, organization, or company can help you assess for possible biasness.

For example, let’s say you found an article in the online newspaper-The Truth at Last-stating how black slaves enjoyed the idea of slavery. There is nothing in the title of the newspaper that would necessarily lead you to believe this is a biased perspective. However, upon looking at the page describing the goals of this newspaper, you discover it is published by a group of individuals that advocate the segregation of the white and black races.

Thus, the article you read could be suspect based on the extreme position of the sponsoring group. c) If there is any advertising on the page, is it clearly differentiated from the informational content? WHY IMPORTANT? – The intent of advertising is to sell a product or idea.

Sometimes advertising is woven into an article, where it is hard to notice that the information presented is actually part of an advertisement. An example in the print world would be a multi-page, special advertising insert in Newsweek, paid for by a leading group of pharmaceutical companies that discusses new developments in drug treatments for arthritis.

Although the article is very informative, its intent is to promote the products of particular companies. In the Web environment, it is especially important to critically examine information presented on commercial sites (.com). Are there dates on the page to indicate when the page was written, when the page was first placed on the Web,or when the page was last revised? WHY IMPORTANT? – Some information is very time sensitive.

• For example, a page talking about the top rate Web search engines in 1997 is going to be horribly out of date in 2000.
• There have been incredible changes in search engine technology and new developments appear almost monthly.
• However, a page discussing the Civil War is likely still relevant today even if the page was created in 1996 and has not been updated.

Regardless, a site should always provide some indication of when the information was created or the site was last updated. a) Are these topics successfully addressed, with clearly presented arguments and adequate support to substantiate them? b) Does the work update other sources, substantiate other materials you have read, or add new information? Does it extensively or marginally cover your topic? c) Is the target audience identified and appropriate for your needs? WHY IMPORTANT? – Coverage is one of the most important factors to consider before using the information on a Web page.

If the information appears one-sided, it could be evidence of bias (see objectivity ). You should explore enough sources to obtain a variety of viewpoints and thereby determine where a particular view fits on the continuum. Also, you will want to see if a page is presenting a new perspective on the topic, or just summarizing other sources.

If it summarizes other sources, you will likely want to get hold of the originals. If it is difficult to assess the topics covered in a page or the arguments are not presented very clearly, you might reconsider before referencing this site. Finally, be aware of the target audience to whom a page is directed.

The target audience has a direct bearing on the coverage of a site. For example, if you find a page dealing with evolution on a K-12 educational site, it is likely the material may be too simplified for a college biology paper. a) Does the site look well organized? b) Do the links work? c) Does the site appear that it is well maintained? d) Do graphics and multimedia obscure content? WHY IMPORTANT – In the print world, one way of assessing quality in a book is through its physical layout and appearance: the sturdiness of the binding and cover material, the presence of a well-organized table of contents and a comprehensive index, clear typeface, appropriate illustrations, etc.

This attention to detail reflects an inherent quality. Likewise, in the Web environment, a sign of quality in a site is external links that work properly, an organizational structure that allows one to quickly determine the content and access it equally fast, and graphics or multimedia that complement the information presented.

What are the criteria in evaluating information purpose?

Accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency and coverage are the five basic criteria for evaluating information from any sources.

What are the key evaluation criteria?

Applying Evaluation Criteria Thoughtfully – Relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, and sustainability are widely used evaluation criteria, particularly in international development co-operation. They help to determine the merit or worth of various interventions, such as strategies, policies, programmes or projects.

• This guidance aims to help evaluators and others to better understand those criteria, and improve their use.
• It starts by describing what they are, and how they are meant to be used.
• Then the definitions and concepts underpinning each criterion are explained.
• Finally, examples provide the reader with concrete ideas for using them.

The criteria were originally laid out in the early 2000s by the Network on Development Evaluation (EvalNet) of the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Although they have been widely used in evaluation, and beyond, this document is the first to comprehensively explore the concepts in detail, explain their intended use and offer practical guidance.

Click to access: Click to access in HTML WEB Click to download PDF – 2.00MB PDF Click to download EPUB – 1.32MB ePUB Click to Read online and share READ

What are the two factors that can be used to evaluate health?

Life expectancy and Quality of life are used to evaluate overall health because Life expectancy and quality of life talks about the number of a human can be expected to live or is a degree of overall satisfaction that a person gets from life.